.jpg)
How Apple Built China and Found Itself Trapped
By Apirate Monk
In the early 2000s, as Apple was clawing its way back from the brink of bankruptcy, a strategic decision was made in Cupertino that would reshape not only the company but also the global economic landscape. Under the leadership of Steve Jobs and, later, Tim Cook, Apple turned to China, not merely as a manufacturing hub but as a canvas for an unprecedented industrial experiment. The result was a symbiotic relationship that transformed China into a high-tech juggernaut and Apple into the world’s most valuable company. But as Patrick McGee reveals in his explosive book, Apple in China: The Capture of the World’s Greatest Company, this partnership has come at a profound cost—one that leaves Apple, and by extension the United States, ensnared in a geopolitical quagmire with no easy escape.
McGee, a former Financial Times reporter who covered Apple from 2019 to 2023, spent years piecing together this story through over 200 interviews, internal documents, and a deep dive into the mechanics of Apple’s supply chain. His findings paint a picture of a company that didn’t just outsource production but orchestrated a nation-building effort in China, training millions, investing billions, and inadvertently empowering an authoritarian state. The narrative is not one of malice but of unintended consequences—a cautionary tale of shareholder-driven capitalism colliding with geopolitical realities.
The Scale of Apple’s Ambition
Apple’s journey into China began in earnest in the early 2000s, a time when the company was riding the success of the iPod and laying the groundwork for the iPhone. China, then a developing nation with a vast, low-cost labor force, offered an irresistible opportunity. But Apple’s approach was not that of a typical multinational seeking cheap labor. As McGee details, Apple invested heavily—$55 billion annually by 2015, according to internal studies—into creating a supply chain of unparalleled precision and scale. This wasn’t just about assembling iPhones; it was about building the infrastructure, expertise, and workforce capable of producing 230 million flawless devices each year.
The numbers are staggering. Since 2008, Apple has trained 28 million Chinese workers—more than the entire labor force of California. These aren’t just low-skill assembly line jobs; Apple’s influence extends to PhDs at Foxconn, the Taiwanese manufacturing giant that became Apple’s primary partner. Apple didn’t merely contract with suppliers; it embedded its engineers—America’s best, from institutions like Caltech, Stanford, and MIT—into Chinese factories, mentoring, auditing, and designing the machinery that builds the machines. In doing so, Apple pushed its suppliers beyond their perceived capabilities, creating a workforce and industrial ecosystem that didn’t exist before.
This investment dwarfed even governmental efforts. McGee compares Apple’s annual $55 billion outlay to the U.S. CHIPS Act, a $53 billion initiative spread over four years to bring chip manufacturing back to America. Even more striking, when adjusted for inflation, Apple’s spending in China outstripped the post-World War II Marshall Plan, which rebuilt 16 European nations, by a factor of two—for a single country, in a single sector: advanced electronics.
The Yellow Cows and the Political Awakening
Apple’s success in China wasn’t just about production; it was also about consumption. By 2010, the iPhone had become a status symbol in a nation newly embracing capitalism. With only four Apple stores serving 1.4 billion people, demand far outstripped supply. This created a black-market opportunity seized by gangsters known as “yellow cows,” who paid migrants to line up by the thousands outside Apple stores, buying iPhones to resell at inflated prices in cities like Chongqing, which had no Apple stores despite a population of 32 million. These yellow cows, McGee recounts, were so sophisticated that they tampered with phone components, swapping out expensive parts like memory and returning the altered devices to Apple, a scheme that took years to uncover.
This chaotic market dynamic led to Apple’s “political awakening” in 2013, shortly after Xi Jinping assumed power. On March 15, China’s Consumer Day—a state-sponsored event that critiques companies for failing to uphold “socialist ethos”—Apple was singled out for alleged warranty discrepancies. State media, led by CCTV, accused Apple of treating Chinese consumers as inferior, a charge that, while rooted in the yellow cow scandal, was largely exaggerated. The attack sent Apple’s sales in China into a tailspin, forcing the company to deploy a team dubbed “The Gang of Eight” to navigate Beijing’s political landscape. This moment marked a shift: Apple realized it was not just a company operating in China but a geopolitical player entangled with an increasingly assertive regime.
The Prometheus Problem
McGee likens Apple to Prometheus, the Greek titan who gifted fire to humanity, only to be punished for it. By transferring cutting-edge technology and expertise to China, Apple has empowered its suppliers—and, by extension, its competitors. Today, Chinese brands like Huawei, OPPO, Vivo, and Xiaomi command 55% of the global smartphone market. These companies didn’t just emerge; they were trained by Apple’s rigorous standards, their suppliers honed by the same engineers who perfected the iPhone. As McGee puts it, “iPhone never had more than 20% global market share. They’re not big enough to have killed Nokia. Who killed Nokia? The Chinese competition.”
This technology transfer extends beyond smartphones. The skills Apple imparted—precision engineering, advanced automation—are directly applicable to electric vehicles (EVs), drones, and even military weaponry. China’s dominance in EV production, for instance, owes much to Apple’s playbook, with Tesla following a similar model by hiring Apple engineers to train Chinese suppliers. The irony is stark: Apple, driven by a quest for quality and efficiency, has armed a nation that Xi Jinping has steered toward authoritarianism and territorial ambition, including threats to annex Taiwan, where 100% of Apple’s critical CPU chips are made.
The Geopolitical Trap
Apple’s dependence on China is now a liability. With 90% of its production concentrated there, the company is, as McGee argues, “stuck.” This became painfully clear in 2019, when Huawei briefly outsold the iPhone globally, prompting internal panic at Apple. Emails uncovered by McGee reveal Tim Cook describing the situation as a “disaster,” with executives scrambling to address a shrinking China sales forecast while publicly downplaying the crisis to investors. The Trump administration’s designation of Huawei as a security threat, cutting it off from Google and Qualcomm chips, inadvertently saved Apple by tanking Huawei’s market share. But this was a temporary reprieve. Huawei has since developed its own operating system, HarmonyOS, which McGee predicts could become the standard for Chinese smartphones, potentially challenging Apple’s dominance.
The broader implications are chilling. China controls not just the manufacturing but also the supply chain for critical components like rare earth metals and batteries, which constitute 80-90% of the global market. A single F-35 jet, McGee notes, contains 800 pounds of rare earths, underscoring China’s stranglehold on materials essential to both consumer electronics and military technology. In a trade war, China holds the cards, a reality that forced Trump to back off his initial tariff threats in 2025 after Apple’s market value plummeted by $800 billion in days.
The Human Cost
The human toll of Apple’s China strategy is equally sobering. McGee recounts the “Divorce Avoidance Program” (DAP), a grimly named initiative to mitigate the strain on engineers’ families as they shuttled between the U.S. and China. In the early 2000s, as Apple scaled up production, engineers were flying to China so frequently that marriages crumbled. Apple responded with bonuses—$10,000 per unexpected trip for spouses—and mandatory time off, but the nickname “Apple widows” stuck among those left behind. The program underscores the personal sacrifices demanded by Apple’s relentless pursuit of perfection.
On the Chinese side, the narrative often focuses on labor abuses—suicide nets outside Foxconn factories, dorm-like living conditions, and a churn-and-burn workforce. McGee shifts this perspective, arguing that Beijing allowed Apple to exploit Chinese workers to gain technological expertise. This mutual exploitation enabled China to leap from poverty to industrial dominance, but it also entrenched Apple’s dependence on a system it can neither control nor easily exit.
The Road Ahead
As the U.S. grapples with its reliance on China, the idea of “reshoring” manufacturing has gained traction, championed by figures like Trump who promise to bring jobs back to America. But McGee is skeptical. Apple’s attempt to build the Mac Pro in Texas in 2013 was a “fiasco,” with engineers struggling to produce even 500 units a day compared to the million iPhones churned out daily in China. The U.S. lacks the population density, infrastructure, and industrial clusters that China has spent decades cultivating. A single iPhone requires a billion components daily, a logistical feat McGee deems impossible to replicate in America anytime soon.
Instead, McGee advocates for “friend-shoring”—shifting production to allied nations like India or Mexico. India, despite its democratic challenges and fragmented governance, has potential, but it lacks the command-and-control efficiency of China’s state-driven model. Mexico, with its proximity to the U.S. and existing manufacturing base, is a more viable option, but even this would require decades of investment to match China’s capabilities.
The Irony of Competition
Perhaps the greatest irony is that Apple, often accused of monopolistic practices, has inadvertently created a more competitive market by training its rivals. By insisting that suppliers diversify their client base to avoid over-dependence, Apple ensured that companies like Huawei could leverage the same expertise to challenge it. This dynamic, born of shareholder-driven imperatives to maximize efficiency, has backfired, leaving Apple encircled in a geopolitical game of Go, where China’s strategy is not to deliver a checkmate but to render its opponent immobile.
As McGee concludes, Apple’s story is a Trojan horse: a tale of innovation and success that masks a deeper narrative about supply chains, technology transfer, and the U.S.-China tech rivalry. The company that revolutionized the smartphone industry has also revolutionized China’s industrial capacity, with consequences that ripple far beyond Cupertino. For Apple, the question is not just how to maintain its market dominance but how to navigate a world where the skills it taught may be used against it—and the nation it calls home.
Apple in China: The Capture of the World’s Greatest Company by Patrick McGee is available at appleinchina.com, Amazon, and other major retailers.
Comments